Iryna Huk

Total 5 Posts

Iryna obtained her dual law degree from the University of Windsor and Detroit Mercy Law School. Prior to law school, Iryna completed a bachelor’s degree in Urban and Regional Planning at Toronto Metropolitan University. Iryna is currently completing her articles in estates and trusts, where she continues to bring her dedication and passion for client-focused service to this next chapter of her career.

Court of Appeal Confirms No Duty Owed by Lawyer to Non-Client

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision reinforced a simple but important rule: lawyers generally owe duties only to their clients – not to third parties who may be affected by their work. The case of Stingelin Estate v. Woods, 2026 ONCA 240 arose out of a family dispute over property, wills, and trusts. The case ultimately turned on whether a lawyer could be held liable to someone who was….

Court of Appeal Confirms No Duty Owed by Lawyer to Non-Client Continue Reading »

Appeals

BC Court of Appeal Clarifies Vesting of Residuary Gifts

A recent decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Lewis v. Jack, 2026 BCCA 18, provides helpful guidance on will interpretation. The case focused on whether the testator’s gifts to his children vested at the time of his death or later, when the residue of the estate was distributed. The Court’s analysis reinforces the strength of the presumption of early vesting and serves as a reminder that testamentary….

BC Court of Appeal Clarifies Vesting of Residuary Gifts Continue Reading »

Uncategorized

Moral Obligations Matter: Recent Dependant Support Decisions in Ontario

In recent years, Ontario courts have placed increasing emphasis on the moral obligations owed to dependants when assessing claims under Part V of the Succession Law Reform Act (“SLRA”). While testamentary autonomy remains a fundamental principle, recent decisions show that courts are prepared to intervene where a will fails to make adequate provision for a spouse or other dependant, even in circumstances where the claimant is not in immediate financial….

Moral Obligations Matter: Recent Dependant Support Decisions in Ontario Continue Reading »

Uncategorized

Haddock v. Haddock: Interpreting a Cottage Bequest

In Haddock v. Haddock (2025 ONSC 6287), the court was asked to interpret a clause in the deceased’s 2012 will dealing with a bequest of her cottage to one of her three surviving children. The deceased died in 2022, leaving her children as co-estate trustees. Her estate consisted primarily of the cottage and TD Bank investment accounts. The will provided a specific gift to the grandchildren, divided the residue equally….

Haddock v. Haddock: Interpreting a Cottage Bequest Continue Reading »

Estate Litigation, Property, Wills

McNeill v. Phillips: Moral Obligations Don’t Create Legal Duties

A recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court serves as a reminder that a moral obligation does not necessarily translate into a legal one. In McNeill v. Phillips, 2025 ONSC 5779, the Court struck a claim that sought to impose a duty of care where none existed in law. The plaintiff, the biological daughter of the deceased, brought a negligence claim against her mother’s spouse, who was not her biological….

McNeill v. Phillips: Moral Obligations Don’t Create Legal Duties Continue Reading »

Uncategorized
Scroll to Top